Skip to content

FAPI-CIBA shall be inheriting these sections from a chosen security profile (FAPI 1 or FAPI 2)? #675

Open
#867
Open
FAPI-CIBA shall be inheriting these sections from a chosen security profile (FAPI 1 or FAPI 2)?#675
#867
Assignees
davidgtonge
Labels
component: CIBACIBAmigrated-from-bitbucketMigrated from Bitbucketpriority: majorMajor prioritytype: proposalProposal
Milestone
3rd Implementers Draft

Description

@bitbucket-import-issues
bitbucket-import-issues
bot
opened on Jul 2, 2026

Originally submitted by Dima Postnikov (Dima Postnikov) on 2024-03-30

7.9.  TLS considerations

7.10.  Algorithm considerations

7.11.  Encryption algorithm considerations

probably not relevant for FAPI2

8.  Privacy Considerations

plus [CIBA] here

‌

Bitbucket status: open

Bitbucket origin: issue 687

Activity

  1. bitbucket-import-issues
    added this to the 3rd Implementers Draft milestone on Jul 2, 2026
  2. bitbucket-import-issues
    added
    type: proposalProposal
    priority: majorMajor priority
    migrated-from-bitbucketMigrated from Bitbucket
    component: CIBACIBA
    on Jul 2, 2026
  3. sakimura
    assigned
    davidgtonge
    on Jul 11, 2026

  4. davetonge-mh commented on Sep 16, 2026

    @davetonge-mh
    davetonge-mh
    on Sep 16, 2026
    Contributor

    Opened a PR for this: #867

    CIBA should follow the TLS and algorithm requirements of whichever FAPI security profile is in use, rather than duplicating them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

component: CIBACIBAmigrated-from-bitbucketMigrated from Bitbucketpriority: majorMajor prioritytype: proposalProposal

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions