arena/01a0ff9b-awesome-copilotfix(workflows): use copilot-requests auth for PR Quality Signal Review

[emilus512-cmyk]

The agent failed to resolve the 'auto' model alias because the COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secret returned 401 on the models endpoint. Grant copilot-requests: write so the engine authenticates with the workflow GITHUB_TOKEN, matching the other agentic workflows.

Fixes #3669

Pull Request Checklist

• I have read and followed the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines.
• I have read and followed the Guidance for submissions involving paid services.
• My contribution adds a new instruction, prompt, agent, skill, workflow, or canvas extension file in the correct directory.
• The file follows the required naming convention.
• The content is clearly structured and follows the example format.
• I have tested my instructions, prompt, agent, skill, workflow, or canvas extension with GitHub Copilot.
• I have run npm start and verified that README.md is up to date.
• I am targeting the main branch for this pull request.

---

Description

---

Type of Contribution

• New instruction file.
• New prompt file.
• New agent file.
• New plugin.
• New skill file.
• New agentic workflow.
• New canvas extension.
• Update to existing instruction, prompt, agent, plugin, skill, workflow, or canvas extension.
• Other (please specify):

---

Additional Notes

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution abides by the Code of Conduct and will be licensed under the MIT License.

[github-actions]

🚦 Submission status: ⏳ Awaiting automation

Risk tier: merge-risk:high — Privileged execution, automation, or review-policy change
Required to merge: passing submission-gate checks plus 2 approvals from reviewers with write access, including a maintainer with admin or maintain permission.

Why this tier

• .github/workflows/pr-quality-signal.lock.yml is a high-risk path (automation, scripts, MCP config, hooks, or review policy)
• .github/workflows/pr-quality-signal.md is a high-risk path (automation, scripts, MCP config, hooks, or review policy)

Automated checks

Check	Status	Details
Line endings	🔧 Infrastructure failure	Waiting for a maintainer to approve workflow runs for this PR · logs
Spelling	🔧 Infrastructure failure	Waiting for a maintainer to approve workflow runs for this PR · logs
Submission gate tests	🔧 Infrastructure failure	Waiting for a maintainer to approve workflow runs for this PR · logs
Contributor reputation	🔧 Infrastructure failure	Waiting for a maintainer to approve workflow runs for this PR · logs
Duplicate resource scan	⚠️ Failed (advisory, non-blocking)	Waiting for a maintainer to approve workflow runs for this PR · logs
PR quality signal	⚠️ Failed (advisory, non-blocking)	Waiting for a maintainer to approve workflow runs for this PR · logs

Action needed

• 🔧 Line endings, Spelling, Submission gate tests, Contributor reputation hit an automation problem that is not caused by your contribution. Comment /rerun-checks to retry; maintainers are notified if it keeps failing.
• ⚠️ Advisory checks did not complete (Duplicate resource scan, PR quality signal). This does not block the PR.

Review

• Approvals: 0/2
• Assigned reviewer: not assigned yet — comment /request-review to ask for one
• Review target date: not set
• Still needed: 2 more approval(s); an approval from a maintainer with admin or maintain permission
• The core-maintainers pool is not staffed yet; an approver with admin or maintain permission is required instead.

Commands

Command	Who	What it does
/rerun-checks	PR author, maintainers	Re-runs failed or incomplete checks and re-evaluates this gate
/request-review	PR author, maintainers	Asks the review rotation to assign a reviewer (adds needs-reviewer)

_{Updated for 04e161d · gate run · This comment is maintained automatically — see submission gate docs.}

[aaronpowell]

We're currently overhauling our workflows, so I'm going to close this for the time being.