Skip to content

feat(sepolia): schedule gloas at epoch 353024 - #111

Merged
samcm merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/sepolia-gloas
Sep 29, 2026
Merged

samcm merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/sepolia-gloas

Conversation

@samcm

@samcm samcm commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Adds the Sepolia Gloas fork (epoch 353024, 2026-10-06 13:53:36 UTC, per eth-clients/sepolia#126) so it shows up as an upcoming fork on lab's fork readiness page.

minClientVersions lists the Sepolia-ready CL releases published so far: prysm v7.2.0, lodestar v1.49.0, teku 26.9.1. Lighthouse, nimbus, grandine and tysm get added as their Sepolia releases land.

Only gloas is added (no glamsterdam alias): lab derives the combined name from its fork registry, and a second key would render a duplicate fork section.

Sepolia activates Glamsterdam at epoch 353024 (2026-10-06 13:53:36 UTC),
per eth-clients/sepolia#126. Min client versions cover the Sepolia-ready
CL releases shipped so far: prysm v7.2.0, lodestar v1.49.0, teku 26.9.1.
@samcm
samcm merged commit bc34e70 into master Sep 29, 2026
3 checks passed
@samcm
samcm deleted the feat/sepolia-gloas branch September 29, 2026 04:04

@redpandabot redpandabot Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adds the Sepolia gloas fork at epoch 353024 to the static production config. Every claim checks out: the epoch matches eth-clients/sepolia's metadata config (GLOAS_FORK_EPOCH: 353024, no glamsterdam scheduled), the fork lands 2026-10-06T13:53:36Z per the genesis/slot math, and each listed minClientVersions release (prysm v7.2.0, lodestar v1.49.0, teku 26.9.1) bakes Sepolia gloas at 353024 into its network configs. Omitted clients genuinely have no Sepolia-ready release — Lighthouse v8.2.2's built-in Sepolia config still carries FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH for gloas. No blob-schedule changes were needed; upstream has no further BPO entries.


Reviewed 1 changed file(s) @ 0d1b180d — no blocking issues found.
"If debugging is the process of removing software bugs, then programming must be the process of putting them in." — Edsger Dijkstra

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant