Skip to content

removal-10: avoid the octal ambiguity to C-style numbers - #129

Open
cabo wants to merge 2 commits into
editorial-27rfrom
removal-10
Open

cabo wants to merge 2 commits into
editorial-27rfrom
removal-10

Conversation

@cabo

@cabo cabo commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@cabo
cabo requested a review from rohanmahy August 26, 2026 15:44
@rohanmahy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I approved this, but I think it would be logical to remove the leading optional + in the same PR.

Comment thread draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals.md Resolved
Generalize the mention of XSD in the `030` example to "other languages"

Co-authored-by: Rohan Mahy <rohan.mahy@gmail.com>
@cabo

cabo commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I approved this, but I think it would be logical to remove the leading optional + in the same PR.

Do you see an ambiguity problem like with leading insignificant zeroes?

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants