Does this Git Archaeologist finding match your view of xstate's risk areas?

[SushantVerma7969]

I built an open-source git-history analysis tool called Git Archaeologist and I'm trying to understand where its output matches or diverges from maintainers' experience.

On xstate it flags lib/ as single-owner concentrated and ranks packages/core/src/types.ts among the highest-churn files.

Does that match where the real concentration and instability sit, or is it surfacing the wrong scope?