Repository navigation
[QUESTION] There is a small difference between generated URDF and provided Mujoco XML of OpenArm v1.0 #392
Replies: 1 comment
|
Short answer: dropping What In Where the real difference was Your target frame, the hand or TCP, didn't sit at the same pose in both models:
That's a 4.5 mm offset along link7's y-axis. It rotates with the wrist, so IK solutions from the URDF land about 4.5 mm off when replayed in that MuJoCo model. It's small for most grasps, but it shows up in precise insertion or contact tasks. What to do now Both repos have since been aligned. If you're pinned to the older versions, either add the fixed frame back in your URDF ( |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I generated a URDF file from these ROS packages
https://github.com/enactic/openarm_ros2.git
https://github.com/enactic/openarm_description.git
Using this command
xacro ./openarm_description/urdf/robot/v10.urdf.xacro arm_type:=v10 bimanual:=true > openarm_bimanual.urdfBellow is the generated URDF
Compared to this mujoco XML file for v1 at https://github.com/enactic/openarm_mujoco,
openarm_left_link8is commented out in the generated URDF. I am using https://github.com/stack-of-tasks/pinocchio as an IK solver and it requires a URDF of the OpenArm.Will the difference have any impact on the result of the IK solver?
All reactions