Repository navigation
Comparing SEN2COR and FORCE BOA #413
JonasardoLundUniv
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
|
as far as I know, the ESA L2 product adds an offset of 1000 for scaling purposes. I think you find this offset in their metadata. Cheers, |
1 reply
|
Dear @JonasardoLundUniv, All the very best, |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment





Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We compared reflectances (BOA) for Sentinel-2 (band 2,3,4,8) from SEN2COR (S2B_MSIL2A_20240905T102559_N0511_R108_T33UUB_20240905T163108.SAFE) and FORCE (S2B_MSIL1C_20240905T102559_N0511_R108_T33UUB_20240905T154834.SAFE) as shown below. Only pixles with highets FORCE quality flag (0) included.
A systematic bias for the visual bands and some spread in NIR, even if R2 are fairly high. In 2018, an Atmospheric Correction Inter-Comparison Exercise including both SEN2COR and FORCE was published https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/2/352 . I assume there been some changes to both SEN2COR and FORCE since then. When computing NDVI for example, one adds these biases in the denominator reducing comparability.
Anybody who looked into such differences in more detail?
Regards
/Jonas Ardö, Lund University
All reactions